ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Augmenting fact and date of death in electronic health records using internet media sources: a validation study from two large healthcare systems.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy and Equity of the End-of-Life Care Index in Predicting 1-Year Mortality.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Enhancing cause of death prediction: development and validation of machine learning models using multimodal data across multiple health-care sites.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Developing a Natural Language Processing Strategy to Avoid Biased Data in Electronic Health Record Suicide Risk Modeling.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- Automated Extraction of Mortality Information From Publicly Available Sources Using Large Language Models: Development and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated death ascertainment from publicly available internet sources for patients in two large tertiary care US healthcare systems, Mass General Brigham (MGB) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), benchmarked against state and federal vital statistics data. Names, dates of birth, and dates of death were extracted from 8.1 million internet media records using previously developed natural language processing models. Internet records were matched to 78 848 deceased patients from MGB and VUMC on first name, last name, and date of birth. Dates of death were validated against state vital statistics databases or the National Death Index as reference standards. We calculated sensitivity and positive predicted values (PPV) of internet sources in identifying dates of death within 7 days of the reference standard. Exact matching of records between internet media and reference standards on first name, last name, and date of birth, resulted in 30 067 (38.8%) matches, which showed PPV for death identification (98.2%-MGB; 98.9%-VUMC) in internet media and increased sensitivity of death capture over EHR alone by 24% at MGB and 18% at VUMC. In conclusion, using internet sources to augment mortality data increased capture of death meaningfully over reliance on EHR records alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.