Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307234›Full record

ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2026

Cocreating a Responsive Organization: Disclosure and Responsivity in Veterinary Ophthalmology.

Amanda R Steidlmayer, Karl E Jandrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda R SteidlmayerUniversity of California, Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
Karl E JandreyUniversity of California, Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-7817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have become defining priorities within veterinary ophthalmology, as reflected in editorial leadership, association-level initiatives, and professional development programs. To translate these professional commitments into daily practice requires more than isolated efforts by individual practitioners. This paper proposes disclosure-responsivity cycles as a practical framework to empower leaders to embed DEI concepts into their daily operations. Disclosure is an individual's decision to share personal or professional information (e.g., acknowledge medical errors or reveal identity characteristics). Responsivity describes the degree to which individuals feel supported after disclosure, both interpersonally and organizationally. Research shows that when organizations are consistently responsive, disclosure reduces psychological strain, builds trust, and enhances inclusivity. The key challenge, therefore, is to cocreate organizations that support disclosure with fair and reliable responsivity. Drawing on organizational theory, change management, and veterinary literature, this paper identifies four domains where disclosure-responsivity cycles can be institutionalized: shared vision, communication channels, competency development, and policy transparency. Together, these domains create interdependent systems that embed DEI into daily practice. For veterinary ophthalmologists, this framework offers a path to cultivate organizations that are adaptive, inclusive, and resilient.

Indexed as

DisclosureOphthalmologyVeterinary MedicineAnimalsHumansVeterinarians

Identifiers

PMID41307234
PMCPMC12963531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.