ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Multi-Institutional Endoscopic Resection and Reconstitution for Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Reference to Multi-Institutional Endoscopic Resection and Reconstitution for Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis in Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study of Management and Maternal Safety.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEndoscopic resection and mucosal reconstitution with epidermal grafting (i.e., ER, known as the Maddern procedure) is a minimally invasive surgery introduced 10 years ago to treat subglottic stenosis (SGS). Here we describe a multi-institutional case series to answer questions about durability, patient selection, and complications.
methodsA retrospective review of idiopathic SGS patients who underwent ER at four institutions since 2016. Patients were stratified by primary definitive (only had previous dilations) and rescue (performed for recurrence after laser wedge resection, open surgery, or previous ER) procedures. Outcomes included complications, disease recurrence, need for tracheostomy, peak expiratory flow rates, and surgery-free period following the operation.
resultsThirty-six ER procedures were performed in 33 females and 1 male. Average participant age was 49 (30-72) years and BMI 28.5 (19.1-41.5) kg/m
conclusionThis multi-institutional series demonstrates that the minimally invasive ER procedure, when used as primary definitive surgery, provides durable outcomes for iSGS with a recurrence rate similar to that of open cricotracheal resection over the course of an 8-year follow-up period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.