ArticleHaematologica2026
Hematopoietic cell transplantation after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy for remission consolidation or relapse treatment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The dilemma after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy - to transplant or not?Haematologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relapse of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR19) remains a substantial challenge. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) represents an approach for both post-CAR19 relapse prevention and relapse therapy. However, there is a paucity of detailed HCT safety and outcome data in this population. We conducted a retrospective review of 47 children and young adults with B-ALL who underwent first HCT for post-CAR19 remission consolidation (preemptive cohort, N=26) or relapse therapy (relapse cohort, N=21). With a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 3-year disease-free survival was 90% in the preemptive cohort and 64% in the relapse cohort. Overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and non-relapse mortality at 3 years were 95%, 5%, and 5%, respectively, in the preemptive cohort and 67%, 20%, and 15%, repectively, in the relapse cohort. The cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was 14% in the preemptive cohort and 19% in the relapse cohort. Chronic GvHD developed in 24% and 14% of patients alive at 100 days in the preemptive and relapse cohorts, respectively. Veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was the most common non-GvHD severe organ toxicity, with a cumulative incidence of 10% in the preemptive cohort and 31% in the relapse cohort. In appropriate patients, HCT can be an effective strategy for attaining durable B-ALL remission when used preemptively after CAR19 or as part of post-CAR19 relapse salvage therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.