ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2025
Objective Evaluation of Small Bowel Visualization Quality in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy Images Using Generative Adversarial Network.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Capsule endoscopy is a non-invasive procedure used to visualize the small bowel, but optimal bowel preparation remains uncertain due to the absence of objective, automated evaluation techniques. Manual assessments by gastroenterologists are time-consuming and can suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability. This study aims to develop an objective, automated method to evaluate small bowel visualization quality in capsule endoscopy images. We developed a generative adversarial network to provide consistent assessments of image quality. Materials and Methods: We randomly selected 1500 images from the Kvasir capsule endoscopy dataset, representing various disturbing factors like bubbles, debris, bile, and specular reflections, each with differing contamination levels. Clean and contaminated regions were annotated by three different annotators under the guidance of a gastroenterologist. A Pix2Pix network, known for its powerful image-to-image translation abilities, was employed for this task. It was trained on 300 annotated images and evaluated on a larger provided test dataset. Results: The network achieved a Dice similarity score of 0.92 ± 0.07, an intersection over union of 0.86 ± 0.12, and an accuracy of 0.91 ± 0.09 on the test subset. Conclusions: The proposed model requires only a small set of annotated images during training and is well-suited for clinical applications, including quality control of capsule endoscopy videos, objective comparison of bowel preparation protocols, and assessment of antifoaming agents. Future work will explore applying the model to other modalities, such as colonoscopy and conventional endoscopy, and expanding its capabilities to segment other artifacts, enhancing its overall clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.