ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Comparing the kinematics related to inflicted head injury between violent shaking of a 6-week-old and a 1-year-old infant surrogate.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic neuropathology: 2026 update.Free neuropathology · 2026Review
- Comparing the kinematics related to inflicted head injury between violent shaking of a 6-week-old and a 1-year-old infant surrogate.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Annually, 14-41 per 100 000 infants get mildly to lethally injured or severely disabled through violent shaking. The incidence and mortality of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma (IHI-ST) are highest in the early months and decrease with age. This may partly be due to the age-related physical characteristics of infants. Younger, smaller infants are more vulnerable owing to their size and material properties. In addition, from basic biomechanics, it is expected that larger or heavier infants may be more difficult to fiercely shake and will exhibit different motion patterns when being shaken violently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the kinematics of shaking a smaller versus a larger infant dummy. We recorded the kinematics of two dummies, representing a 6-week-old and a 1-year-old, while they were violently shaken by volunteers. We found that participants induced higher head and torso accelerations when shaking the 6-week-old, than with the 1-year-old dummy. Moreover, higher peak sagittal angular accelerations coincide with smaller radii of rotation in the 6-week-old than in the 1-year-old. Because it has been suggested in the literature that sagittal angular acceleration of the head is an important mechanism in inducing the injuries associated with IHI-ST; the results of this study show that shaking a smaller/younger infant is more likely to cause the kinematics possibly responsible for IHI-ST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.