Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307064›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

A dynamical measure of algorithmically infused visibility.

Shaojing Sun, Zhiyuan Liu, David Waxman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shaojing SunSchool of Journalism, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-5336
Zhiyuan LiuSchool of Journalism, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-9504
David WaxmanCentre for Quantitative Biology, ISTBI, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-2108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work focuses on the nature of visibility in societies where the behaviours of humans and algorithms influence each other-termed algorithmically infused societies. We propose a quantitative measure of visibility, with implications and applications to an array of disciplines including communication studies, political science, marketing, technology design and social media analytics. The measure captures the basic attributes of the visibility of a given topic in algorithm-mediated communication settings associated, for example, with social media. These attributes are: (i) the amount of time a topic spends at different ranks and (ii) the different ranks the topic attains. In addition, the proposed measure incorporates a tunable parameter, termed the discrimination level, whose value determines the relative weights of the two attributes that contribute to visibility. The proposed measure is applied to the Hot Search List of the Chinese microblog Sina Weibo. Analysis of a large-scale, real-time dataset of topics of this list demonstrates that the proposed measure can explain a large share of the variability of the accumulated views of a topic.

Indexed as

communicationcomputer–human interactionsocial media

Identifiers

PMID41307064
PMCPMC12646761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.