Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307045›Full record

ArticleInternational journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice2025

Do Children Receive Equal Justice Under the Law? A Comparison of Sentence Severity for Crimes with Child and Adult Victims.

Sarah Henry Davis, Sarah A Font

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah Henry DavisPennsylvania State University, State College, USA.
Sarah A FontThe Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the differences in sentencing for offenses involving child victims versus adult victims within a statewide population of adults convicted of physical and sexual assault. Crimes against children are often viewed as particularly heinous and may consequently receive harsher sentences. However, children may be unreliable witnesses or unable to testify, leading to more lenient sentencing through plea agreements. This study investigates the disparities in sentencing for physical and sexual violence against children in comparison to adults. We utilize data from the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, which includes 47,288 adults convicted of physical and sexual assaults between 2014 and 2019. The sentencing outcomes encompass sentence type (incarceration versus noncustodial penalty) and severity (in relation to the presumptive sentence under guidelines). Logistic and linear regression models are employed to adjust for offender demographics and case characteristics. The findings indicate that physical assaults against children are punished less severely than those against adults, while sexual assaults against children receive harsher penalties than sexual assaults against adults. The implications for policy and practice are discussed. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42448-025-00234-2.

Indexed as

Child abuseCriminal justiceSentencingSexual assault

Identifiers

PMID41307045
PMCPMC12644201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.