ArticleChemical science2026
Explainable random forest predictions of polyester biodegradability using high-throughput biodegradation data.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling the Hidden Balance between Quantum Confinement and Structural Modifications in Near-Infrared Fluorescent Carbon Dots.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Benchmarking molecular representations and machine learning algorithms for asymmetric catalysis: a palladium-catalysed decarboxylative asymmetric allylic alkylation case study.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Symmetry-guided monomer design enables the combinatorial synthesis and targeted screening of polyesters.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Explainable random forest predictions of polyester biodegradability using high-throughput biodegradation data.Chemical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of new, biodegradable polyesters is becoming increasingly important as legislative and consumer drivers push society towards more sustainable polymers. One key bottleneck in the development of biodegradable polyesters is the slow nature of biodegradability testing, which can often take weeks to months. High-throughput screening assays serve as a rapid tool to determine the biodegradability of materials quickly, without the need for lengthy, expensive testing. When combined with machine learning, the data generated by high-throughput assays can be exploited to predict the properties of other similar materials. Here, we report the development of a high-throughput enzymatic biodegradation assay, which has been used to determine the biodegradability of 48 polyesters. Using data generated from the assay to train a predictive model, we can predict the biodegradability of polyesters using an explainable random forest model with 71% accuracy. Transfer learning and model chaining were investigated as routes to improve the model predictions by exploiting existing literature data. SHAP analysis gives insight into the beneficial structural features of biodegradable polyesters. This understanding can be applied in the development of future biodegradable polyesters.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.