Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306985›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2025

A long journey towards genome editing technologies in plants: a technical and critical review of genome editing technologies.

Dylan Gallo, Anne-Cécile Meunier, Christophe Périn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dylan GalloUMR AGAP Institut, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Anne-Cécile MeunierUMR AGAP Institut, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Christophe PérinUMR AGAP Institut, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in genome editing technologies, notably CRISPR/Cas9, base editing (BE), and prime editing (PE), have revolutionized plant biotechnology, offering unprecedented precision in crop improvement to address the ongoing global warming challenge. This review provides a critical analysis of recent developments in SpCas9-based editing tools, emphasizing enhancements in editing efficiency and specificity and follow the chronological development of editing tools. We explore methodological innovations, including dual pegRNA strategies and site-specific integrases, that have expanded the potential of PE for precise gene insertions. By integrating insights into DNA repair mechanisms and leveraging SpCas9 enhancements, we outline future directions for the application of genome editing in plant breeding.

Indexed as

genome editingknock-inplantprime editingSpCas9

Identifiers

PMID41306985
PMCPMC12643982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.