Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306956›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicine and life2025

Tailoring BoNT A treatment and assessment across recovery stages after stroke: a report of four clinical cases.

Miruna Săndulescu, Delia Cinteză, Daniel Ionuţ Răducan, Daniela Poenaru, Claudia-Gabriela Potcovaru, Horia Păunescu, Oana Andreia Coman

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miruna SăndulescuDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Delia CintezăDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Daniel Ionuţ RăducanVasile Goldiş Western University, Arad, Romania.
Daniela PoenaruDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Claudia-Gabriela PotcovaruDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Horia PăunescuDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Oana Andreia ComanDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving effective spasticity management in post-stroke patients remains a significant therapeutic challenge. It requires the anticipation and management of multiple potential complications through a complex, individualized therapeutic approach. The therapeutic goals in stroke-related spasticity vary considerably depending on the intensity and duration of spasticity, as well as the degree of motor control in the affected limb segments. This study presents four clinical case reports involving patients with post-stroke spasticity ranging from grade 1+ to 4 on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), each exhibiting a distinct temporal profile of symptom progression and levels of motor control in affected limbs. All patients received conservative rehabilitation therapy in conjunction with botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) administration. Spasticity assessment is essential for evaluating treatment efficacy and for planning and refining rehabilitation strategies. Employing case-appropriate functional clinical scales facilitates dynamic assessment and quantification of motor deficits, thereby enabling precise definition and ongoing monitoring of therapeutic goals. Given the heterogeneous functional status of patients with post-stroke spasticity, therapeutic objectives and evaluation strategies must be tailored accordingly. BoNT-A therapy necessitates a patient-specific approach concerning dosing and injection intervals. Repeated BoNT-A treatment in cases of severe spasticity produced sustained reductions in limb pain and mitigated periarticular tissue damage. In patients with mild spasticity and preserved motor function, functionality reached substantial recovery, as reflected in outcomes from appropriately selected functional measures, with injections spaced at intervals exceeding three months and employing progressively lower doses.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMuscle SpasticityStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionStroke RehabilitationBotulinum Toxins, Type Aabobotulinum toxinfunctional assessmentfunctional outcomepost-stroke spasticity

Identifiers

PMID41306956
PMCPMC12646185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.