ArticleJournal of medicine and life2025
Tailoring BoNT A treatment and assessment across recovery stages after stroke: a report of four clinical cases.
Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Function Through Spasticity Reduction-Effects of Botulinum Toxin A After Stroke: A Prospective Before-After Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving effective spasticity management in post-stroke patients remains a significant therapeutic challenge. It requires the anticipation and management of multiple potential complications through a complex, individualized therapeutic approach. The therapeutic goals in stroke-related spasticity vary considerably depending on the intensity and duration of spasticity, as well as the degree of motor control in the affected limb segments. This study presents four clinical case reports involving patients with post-stroke spasticity ranging from grade 1+ to 4 on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), each exhibiting a distinct temporal profile of symptom progression and levels of motor control in affected limbs. All patients received conservative rehabilitation therapy in conjunction with botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) administration. Spasticity assessment is essential for evaluating treatment efficacy and for planning and refining rehabilitation strategies. Employing case-appropriate functional clinical scales facilitates dynamic assessment and quantification of motor deficits, thereby enabling precise definition and ongoing monitoring of therapeutic goals. Given the heterogeneous functional status of patients with post-stroke spasticity, therapeutic objectives and evaluation strategies must be tailored accordingly. BoNT-A therapy necessitates a patient-specific approach concerning dosing and injection intervals. Repeated BoNT-A treatment in cases of severe spasticity produced sustained reductions in limb pain and mitigated periarticular tissue damage. In patients with mild spasticity and preserved motor function, functionality reached substantial recovery, as reflected in outcomes from appropriately selected functional measures, with injections spaced at intervals exceeding three months and employing progressively lower doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.