Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306855›Full record

ArticleRevista Cuidarte

Advance care planning in people with advanced cancer: a phenomenological study.

Mauricio Arias-Rojas, Sonia Carreño-Moreno, Edith Arredondo Holguín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mauricio Arias-RojasUniversidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. E-mail: emauricio.arias@udea.edu.co Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia emauricio.arias@udea.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2096-1792
Sonia Carreño-MorenoUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. E-mail: spcarrenom@unal.edu.co Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá Colombia spcarrenom@unal.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-6053
Edith Arredondo HolguínUniversidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. E-mail: edith.arredondo@udea.edu.co Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia edith.arredondo@udea.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1907-2787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Significant challenges currently exist in addressing patients' preferences regarding end-of-life care, particularly in the context of advance care planning. Objective: To understand advance care planning at the end of life in people with cancer in palliative care in Medellin Colombia. Materials and Methods: This study used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore the lived experiences of nine patients with advanced cancer. In-depth interviews were conducted, focusing on patients' understanding of advanced care planning. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis to identify major themes related to advance care planning. Results: Six key themes emerged from the data: (1) Clinging to life; (2) Decision delegation and reflective avoidance; (3) Silence to avoid suffering; (4) Resignation; (5) A quiet place; and (6) My legacy. These results describe the experiences of cancer patients in palliative care versus advanced care planning. Discussion: The findings highlight the complexity of advanced care planning in advanced cancer patients in palliative care. Conclusion: This study revealed barriers to care planning, including a lack of understanding of the palliative care process, communication difficulties, and cultural factors.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAdvance DirectivesPalliative CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41306855
PMCPMC12654283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.