Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306835›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of trichology

An

Gaurav Madhukar Nerkar, Pushkar P Waknis, Avinash H Kharat, Sachin B Yeole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of trichology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaurav Madhukar NerkarDepartment of OMFS, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Pushkar P WaknisDepartment of OMFS, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Avinash H KharatDepartment of Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sachin B YeoleSwaroop Clinic, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this Materials and Methods: In this study, hair follicles ( Results: Explant cultures of hair follicles stored at 4°C and 26°C did not show outgrowth of the cells after 7 days of culture. Explant cultures of hair follicles stored at 37°C did show outgrowth of the cells after 7 days of culture. Furthermore, these study results indicated that 10% DMEM preserves hair follicles more effectively than PBS, PRP, and I-PRF. Conclusion: According to the study's findings, freezing graft storage options might not be the best option. Instead of 4°C or room temperature 26°C, 37°C has been shown to improve hair graft survival. Furthermore, these study results indicated that 10% DMEM preserves hair follicles more effectively than PBS, PRP, and I-PRF. The study concluded that maintaining hair follicles in 10% DMEM at 37°C would prolong graft life and improve therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Follicular unit extractionhair follicle storage mediahair follicle viabilityhair transplant

Identifiers

PMID41306835
PMCPMC12646520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.