Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306820›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Neighbourhood topology unveils pathological hubs in the brain networks of epilepsy-surgery patients.

Leonardo Di Gaetano, Fernando A N Santos, Federico Battiston, Ginestra Bianconi, Nicolò Defenu, Ida A Nissen, Elisabeth C W van Straaten, Arjan Hillebrand, Ana P Millán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonardo Di GaetanoDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna 1100, Austria.
Fernando A N SantosInstitute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1012 GC, The Netherlands.
Federico BattistonDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna 1100, Austria.
Ginestra BianconiSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3380-887X
Nicolò DefenuInstitute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8093, Switzerland.
Ida A NissenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth C W van StraatenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan HillebrandDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ana P MillánDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathological hubs in the brain networks of epilepsy patients are hypothesized to drive seizure generation and propagation. In epilepsy-surgery patients, these hubs have traditionally been associated with the resection area (RA): the region removed during the surgery with the goal of stopping the seizures, and which is typically used as a proxy for the epileptogenic zone. However, recent studies hypothesize that pathological hubs may extend to the vicinity of the RA, potentially complicating post-surgical seizure control. Here we propose a neighbourhood-based analysis of brain organization to investigate this hypothesis. We exploit a large dataset of pre-surgical magnetoencephalography-derived whole-brain networks from 91 epilepsy-surgery patients. Our neighbourhood focus is 2-fold. Firstly, we propose a partition of the brain regions into three sets, namely resected nodes, their neighbours and the remaining network nodes. Secondly, we introduce generalized centrality metrics that describe the neighbourhood of each node, providing a regional measure of hubness. Our analyses reveal that both the RA and its neighbourhood present large hub status, but with significant variability across patients. For some, hubs appear in the RA; for others, in its neighbourhood. Moreover, this variability does not correlate with surgical outcome. These results highlight the potential of neighbourhood-based analyses to uncover novel insights into brain connectivity in brain pathologies, and the need for individualized studies, with large enough cohorts, that account for patient-specific variability.

Indexed as

brain hubsbrain networksepilepsymagnetoencephalographytopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID41306820
PMCPMC12646151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.