ArticleCureus2025
Analgesia and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Utilisation for Neck-of-Femur Fracture Patients: A Closed-Loop Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Neck-of-femur (NOF) fractures are a major source of morbidity and mortality among older adults. Timely and effective pain management, including fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), is recommended to optimise outcomes and minimise opioid-related complications. This study compares two audit cycles assessing improvements in analgesic practice, FICB utilisation, and adherence to national guidelines following targeted educational and procedural interventions. Methods Two retrospective audit cycles were conducted in the emergency department at a district general hospital. Cycle 1 (September-October 2023, n = 40) and Cycle 2 (November-December 2024, n = 40). Audit standards were derived from NICE CG124 and RCEM guidance. Following the first cycle results, a mandatory checklist was introduced and disseminated amongst relevant team members, aimed at improving clinical practice. Measured outcomes included time to first analgesia, time to FICB, proportion receiving FICB, pain re-evaluation documentation, and complications. Continuous data were compared using independent samples t-tests; categorical data were analysed using chi-square tests (p < 0.05). Results FICB provision remained similar (Cycle 1: 65.0%, n=26 vs Cycle 2: 65%, n=26, p = 0.74), but both time to first analgesia and time to FICB improved significantly, from 130 minutes to 38.8 minutes (p < 0.001) and from 228 minutes to 63.4 minutes (p = 0.002), respectively. Documentation of pain re-evaluation showed no significant change (52.5%, n=21 versus 50.0%, n=20, p = 0.99). No FICB-related complications were reported. Conclusion Simple interventions such as the use of a mandatory checklist can significantly improve the timing of first analgesia and FICB administration. However, it did not lead to an increase in block utilisation or documentation of pain reassessment. Further quality improvement projects should focus on system-level strategies to embed pain management protocols for neck of femur fracture patients presenting to the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.