Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306788›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Mixed-methods investigation into the prevalence, patterns and determinants of prisoner self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic in England and Wales compared with prepandemic self-harm (COPE).

Kerry Gutridge, Matthias Pierce, Auden Edwardes, Louise Robinson, Emma Plugge, Paula Harriott, Jenny Shaw, Kathryn M Abel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kerry GutridgeCentre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-9102
Matthias PierceCentre for Women's Mental Health, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.
Auden EdwardesCentre for Women's Mental Health, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.
Louise RobinsonLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6455-1360
Emma PluggeDepartment of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Paula HarriottCEO, UNLOCK National Association of Ex-Offenders Ltd, Maidstone, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2956-0698
Jenny ShawCentre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2569-7687
Kathryn M AbelCentre for Women's Mental Health, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COPE investigated the prevalence, patterns and determinants of prisoner self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with pre-pandemic. The project used the natural experiment of the pandemic to understand effects of prison environments on self-harm. Methods: COPE was a mixed-methods study involving all prisons within England and Wales. Participants included 80 437 prisoners identified from routine data sources, 71 (ex)prisoners consulted and 89 staff interviewed (average experience: 18.5 years). The main outcome measure was the rate of self-harm incidents reported. Secondary measures included qualitative assessments of prisoner and staff experiences related to self-harm during the pandemic. Qualitative outcomes were derived from thematic grouping of inmate consultation responses and framework analysis of staff responses. The exposure was the pandemic period from March 2020 to December 2021. Results: There were gender differences in prisoner self-harm rates during the pandemic. In women's prisons, the pandemic was associated with a 7% overall increase in self-harm (95% CI 2% to 13%) and a 43% increase in self-harm requiring hospitalisation (11% to 83%). Conversely, men's prisons saw an 8% self-harm decrease (6% to 11%) and a 21% decrease in self-harm hospitalisation. Policy interventions, for example, in-cell telephones and additional phone credit were linked to reduced self-harm in men's prisons. Introducing video visits was associated with an increase in self-harm in women's and men's prisons. Qualitative analysis revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing these outcomes, including tension between the risk of mental health deterioration because of greater isolation and the perceived safety benefits of a restricted regime. Conclusions: The pandemic, and policy changes, were associated with changes in prisoner self-harm. Distinct patterns emerged between genders underscoring the need for gender-specific prison policies, especially during crisis management. Furthermore, the complex relationship between policy implementation and self-harm highlighted the importance of tailoring prison environments to effectively address the population's diverse needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID41306788
PMCPMC12645642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.