ArticleBMJ public health2025
Mixed-methods psychosocial autopsy study of suicide in young and middle-aged individuals in the Netherlands.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Return of Research Results to Participants in Longitudinal Cohort Studies in Health Research: Findings From 24 Cohorts of the Amsterdam Cohort Hub.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Insights into middle-aged men (40-70) who died by suicide: a nationwide mixed methods study in the Netherlands.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Cognitive Distortion Markers in a Suicide Prevention Chat Service: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sociodemographic characteristics of suicide decedents are recorded in the Netherlands, through which we know who died by suicide, but not why. In this mixed-methods, informant-based psychosocial autopsy, we aimed to identify psychosocial characteristics and precipitating factors of suicide in young (aged 10-30) and middle-aged (40-70 years old) women and men and investigate differences on a group level. Methods: Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and semistructured interviews with bereaved proxy informants. The questionnaire detailed sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics of the suicide decedent. We conducted bivariate analyses to explore differences between women and men. Additionally, we employed the constant comparative method to investigate the perceptions of respondents about key contributing factors and proximal stressors in the months preceding the suicide, as expressed in the interviews. The findings from questionnaires detailing 428 suicide cases were integrated with themes reported in 64 interviews using statistics-by-theme. Results: We identified differences in psychosocial characteristics, proximal stressors and experiences with healthcare of young and middle-aged women and men, including a high prevalence of out-of-the-blue suicide in young men and sexual abuse in young women. Notably, middle-aged men showed no significantly higher rates for any of the considered risk factors in our comparisons. Furthermore, respondents reported the lowest number of perceived contributing factors in young men. Thematic patterns in the interviews concerning young decedents included disconnectedness, a silent struggle and a loss of hope and perspective. In middle-aged decedents, two patterns described a long-term struggle with episodic depression, and conversely a brief suicidal process following an event of loss. In middle-aged women, physical problems and pain were salient topics. Conclusions: Mixed-methods psychosocial autopsy produces a unique empirical perspective on the diverse needs of individuals who died by suicide. We discuss practice implications and possible avenues for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.