ReviewCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of Tools to Identify Anxiety Symptoms and Disorders in Persons with Dementia: a Systematic Review Update.
Review in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited anxiety tools validated against a diagnostic gold standard in the context of dementia have been identified. A systematic review update was completed to identify publications since 2017 describing tools to detect anxiety in persons with dementia compared to a diagnostic gold standard. The original search strategy was replicated in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. Pooled prevalence and diagnostic accuracy estimates were calculated based on three or more studies presenting comparable information from either the original or updated review search. No pooled estimates were calculated in the original review given limited evidence. One study evaluating the Rating Anxiety in Dementia (RAID) scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale met review inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) (n=3, 36.7%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 24.3-49.2%) and diagnostic accuracy outcomes for the RAID scale (≥11 cut-off) to detect GAD (n=3, sensitivity: 89%, 95% CI: 78-95%; specificity: 73%, 95% CI: 60-82%) were calculated using data from two studies identified in the original review and the newly included study from the review update. The RAID scale has the most evidence and adequate sensitivity to support its use in identifying anxiety in persons with dementia. Validated tools to detect anxiety in persons with dementia remain understudied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.