ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2025
Comparison of the performance of machine learning algorithms for the task-switching functional magnetic resonance imaging data for distinguishing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder from bipolar disorder.
Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Comparison of the performance of machine learning algorithms for the task-switching functional magnetic resonance imaging data for distinguishing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder from bipolar disorder.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are two distinct psychiatric disorders characterized by significant overlap in symptoms, making differential diagnosis challenging. Due to the lack of a definitive test for diagnosing and differentiating these disorders, the present study aimed to accurately diagnose and differentiate between patients with BD and ADHD using the support vector machines (SVM) with radial basis function, polynomial, and mixture kernels, as well as ensemble neural networks, to analyze functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Materials and Methods: In this study, 49 individuals with BD and 40 individuals with ADHD were analyzed. A protocol based on fMRI imaging and a switching task was proposed for diagnosing ADHD and BD. The graph theory method calculated the graph criteria using the CONN toolbox in 15 areas of the attention circuit. The effective features were then selected using the genetic algorithm (GA), and finally, the performance of the models was evaluated using four criteria: accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the curve (AUC). Results: 57 effective and important features were selected as input features by GAs with 99.78% ACC. The performance score of the models showed that the SVM with mixture kernels model performed best among the other algorithms (ACC = 92.1%, SE = 92.6%, SP = 97.3%, and AUC = 0.931). Conclusion: According to the evaluation criteria values, the best model for diagnosing ADHD from BD has been suggested. This approach can be useful in diagnosis, psychological, and psychiatric interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.