ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2025
Investigating the level of agreement in the measurement of coronary artery calcification among radiology technicians and radiology specialists.
Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the level of agreement in the measurement of coronary artery calcification among radiology technicians and radiology specialists. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 544 cases in the Radiology Department of Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan in 2021. The archives of heart computed tomography scans were reviewed, and coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) reported by radiology technicians and radiologists were marked and compared. Results: The level of agreement of the score measured by two evaluators in the whole sample is equal to intracluster correlation coefficient = 0.996 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.995-0.997) ( Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate a high level of agreement regarding CACS between technicians and radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.