ArticleComputers & chemical engineering2025
Enhancing the Time-to-Positivity Paradigm for Guidance of Antimicrobial Therapy: A Model-Based Approach.
Article in Computers & chemical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time to positivity (TTP) is a diagnostic parameter in clinical microbiology that measures the duration required for a blood culture to indicate microbial growth. While TTP is intended to support clinical decisions, its current use is largely empirical. If used at all, TTP is always prior to therapy and informs clinicians of infection severity. Clinicians could then react by adjusting clinical management (e.g., through more frequent monitoring, transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), broader spectrum antibiotics, or highest FDA-approved doses). This practice limits both the effectiveness of TTP and its clinical adoption. To address these limitations, we introduce
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.