ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
N-back task revisited: Comparing the neural correlates of updating and interference control.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Working memory arises from the recruitment of multiple and multimodal specialized systems that support different executive functions, such as updating and interference control. This study revisits the n-back task, a classic working memory paradigm, directly comparing two trial types, targets and lures, to delineate the specific neural correlates of the updating and interference control within individual, and their modulation by different load conditions. This question is particularly relevant given evidence that balanced updating and interference control appear to be crucial for psychological resilience and mental health. We took an a priori approach by carefully selecting four different region-of-interest (ROI): bilateral middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), anterior insula, and caudate. A total of 159 healthy, right-handed young adult females (mean age = 23.33 ± 3.89 years) underwent fMRI while performing a verbal n-back task with two load levels and two stimulus types: targets and lures. Activation analyses were performed at both ROI and voxel-wise levels, and connectivity was examined through seed to voxel-wise analyses. Although updating and interference control showed an overlapping brain network, unique (and in some cases opposite) patterns arose for each process. These patterns include (i) stronger activation and differential connectivity of the MFG and caudate during targets compared with lures, (ii) increased cortical, but decreased subcortical activation with load during targets, while the opposite pattern emerged for lures, (iii) left lateralization for targets, but right lateralization during lures. This study uncovers the nuanced neural dynamics underlying updating and interference control during verbal working memory in females, underscoring the interplay between cortical and subcortical brain regions and their integration across cognitive demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.