ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Evolving HPV diagnostics: current practice and future frontiers.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type-specific sensitivity versus detection breadth in HPV diagnostics: improved analytical detection of HPV16/18 by nested PCR.Archives of virology · 2026Article
- Cervical Cytology and HPV16/18/45 mRNA Co-Testing Improve Risk Stratification in Routine Clinical Practice.Cancers · 2026Article
- Therapeutic resistance in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: molecular mechanisms, clinical challenges, and precision strategies.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection serves as a primary causative agent of cervical cancer, highlighting the importance of early screening and detection in mitigating the incidence and mortality rates of HPV-related diseases. Over the past decades, HPV detection technologies have evolved considerably, transitioning from traditional methods to more advanced, patient-centered approaches. This review provides a comprehensive overview of both established and emerging HPV detection strategies, with a particular focus on their clinical applicability, technical advantages, and limitations. Conventional methods such as hybrid capture and PCR-based assays remain the backbone of clinical screening, offering robust sensitivity and specificity. However, their reliance on invasive sampling and centralized laboratory infrastructure limits accessibility and patient compliance, particularly in low-resource settings. To address these limitations, emerging technologies-including CRISPR/Cas systems, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), isothermal amplification techniques (IAT) and artificial intelligence (AI) combined with hpv screening offer enhanced accuracy, rapid turnaround, and the potential for point-of-care deployment. In parallel, innovations in sampling such as self-collected vaginal swabs and liquid biopsy using urine, blood, or extracellular vesicles are improving test acceptability and broadening screening coverage. By summarizing current progress and highlighting ongoing challenges, this review aims to guide the development of more precise, non-invasive, and scalable HPV detection strategies to reduce the global burden of HPV-related disease, support global prevention efforts, and guide public health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.