Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306570›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

A Comparative Protocol for Preserving Deep-Water Marine Invertebrate Tissues: DNA/RNA Shield vs. Liquid Nitrogen for Dual Extraction of High-Quality Nucleic Acids.

Ana S Gomes, Eduarda M Guerreiro, Xavier Pochon, Nigel Keeley, Olivier Laroche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana S GomesInstitute of Marine Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Eduarda M GuerreiroThrombosis Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Xavier PochonBiosurity Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, Tasman, New Zealand.
Nigel KeeleyInstitute of Marine Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Olivier LarocheBiosurity Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, Tasman, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preserving biological samples in the field is essential for ensuring high-quality nucleic acid extraction and reliable downstream molecular analyses. Broadly, two main preservation strategies are available: physical preservation, such as flash freezing in liquid nitrogen, which halts enzymatic activity by rapid cooling, and chemical preservation, using stabilizing reagents that inactivate nucleases and protect nucleic acids even at ambient temperatures. This protocol presents a comparative approach using liquid nitrogen and a commercial stabilizing reagent (DNA/RNA Shield, Zymo Research) to preserve tissue from five marine invertebrate species: two cold-water corals, two sponges, and one bivalve. Samples preserved by each method were processed with the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini kit (Qiagen) to extract both RNA and DNA. RNA quality was assessed using RNA Integrity Number (RIN) scores. The stabilizing reagent preserved high-quality RNA in sponge and bivalve samples but did not prevent RNA degradation in coral tissues, which showed lower RIN scores compared to those preserved in liquid nitrogen. DNA yields were also consistently lower in tissues preserved with DNA/RNA Shield across all species. These findings suggest that DNA/RNA Shield can be a viable alternative to liquid nitrogen for some marine invertebrates, particularly in field conditions where cryopreservation is impractical. However, for cold-water corals, liquid nitrogen remains essential to ensure RNA integrity for transcriptomic analyses and other sensitive molecular applications (e.g., RT-qPCR). Key features • Comparative evaluation of preservation methods across five marine invertebrate species. • Liquid nitrogen is essential for maintaining high RNA integrity in cold-water corals, whereas DNA/RNA Shield effectively preserved RNA in sponges and bivalves. • Streamlined co-extraction protocol using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) enables reliable recovery of DNA and RNA from field-collected marine samples for downstream molecular applications. • Integrated quality control workflow (Qubit, Nanodrop, Bioanalyzer RIN) ensuring robust assessment of nucleic acid yield and integrity for downstream molecular applications.

Indexed as

DNA extractionDNA/RNA ShieldLiquid nitrogenMarine invertebratesNucleic acid qualityRNA preservationTissue preservation

Identifiers

PMID41306570
PMCPMC12645289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.