Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306539›Full record

ArticleCommunications earth & environment2025

Planning with emission models reduces the carbon footprint of new reservoirs.

Tomasz Janus, Christopher Barry, Shelly Win, Jaise Kuriakose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications earth & environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomasz JanusTyndall Centre Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9219-269X
Christopher BarryUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-848X
Shelly WinInternational Water Management Institute (IWMI), Myanmar Office, Yangon, Myanmar.ORCID 0000-0003-2457-8782
Jaise KuriakoseTyndall Centre Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8536-8984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reservoirs collectively contribute 1-2% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, although individual emissions can vary widely. While emission models have considerably advanced our understanding of the lifetime carbon impacts of reservoirs globally and offer means to inform judicious planning, their widespread adoption is hindered by high manual processing requirements, uncertainties, and linkages to geospatial drivers that can be obscure for planners. Meanwhile, simpler Tier 1 methods fail to capture variability across individual reservoirs and can overestimate national emissions by 50% compared to model-based estimates. Here we introduce an automated and transparent framework for large scale reservoir emission assessments and planning with spatially-explicit emission models to address key limitations in current approaches. By applying our framework to strategic hydropower expansion in Myanmar, we show how emission models can support low-carbon reservoir development at large scales. Our results show that the proposed methodology can yield a hydropower strategy for Myanmar that eliminates 0.94 MtCO

Indexed as

Environmental impactLimnology

Identifiers

PMID41306539
PMCPMC12646111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.