ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2025
Development and Validation of a Bilingual Reusable Learning Object to Enhance Mental Health Literacy on Neuroendocrine and Mental Health Disorders Among Youth in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental health literacy in youth: a quasi-experimental comparison of a reusable learning object in Saudi Arabia and Malaysia.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Youth in Saudi Arabia increasingly face mental health challenges such as anxiety, depression, and stress-related disorders. These issues are compounded by stigma, academic pressure, and limited access to mental health education. Mental health literacy (MHL) remains low, delaying recognition of symptoms and help-seeking. This study aimed to develop and validate a bilingual Reusable Learning Object (RLO) to enhance youth's understanding of mental health, with a focus on the neuroendocrine system's role in mood regulation. Methodology: The RLO was developed in English using the open-source Xerte software, guided by the ASPIRE framework (Aims, Storyboarding, Production, Implementation, Release, Evaluation). The 11-page interactive module covers key topics including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, stress response, symptoms of common mental disorders, misconceptions, and self-help strategies. Multimedia and interactive elements such as animations, flash cards, hotspot images were used to enhance engagement. During RLO development, a panel of experts conducted iterative reviews to ensure the content accuracy and instructional quality. A 2-page of built-in Mental Health literacy instrument using a validated questionnaire was used for evaluation.The module was forward- and back-translated to produce an Arabic version, followed by content validation from six bilingual subject matter experts in Mental Health topics. Results: Expert reviewers were able to capture the RLO's clarity, educational value, and suitability for youth. Strengths included interactivity, visual appeal, and a manageable completion time (10-15 minutes). Recommendations included reducing cognitive load, improving conceptual flow, and enhancing feedback on quiz items. Minor technical and linguistic issues were also addressed. For content validation of the Mental Health literacy instrument, a score of S-VA/Ave was 0.761, indicating that most items were considered relevant by most experts. The low UA of 0.188 was addressed by modifying the RLO content and to preserve the English validated questionnaire integrity. Conclusion: This study presents a rigorously developed and validated bilingual RLO aimed at improving MHL among youth in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.