ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Deep learning based on MRI for assessing the prognostic value of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Accurate preoperative evaluation of positive lateral lymph node (LLN) is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in rectal cancer. Traditional methods, such as MRI T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), face limitations like interobserver variability and difficulty detecting small or occult metastases. Deep learning (DL) may provide a more efficient and precise alternative. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, images from 1,000 patients across five centers were annotated to train a DL model for identifying and segmenting LLN. The model was tested on images from 480 patients in a validation cohort. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between LLN-positive and LLN-negative groups, while Cox regression identified prognostic factors for DFS and OS. Results: The DL model achieved an accuracy of 87.5% and a specificity of 73.8% in predicting LLN positivity, demonstrating high diagnostic performance. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified LLN status, circumferential resection margin (CRM), and tumor downstaging (TD) as independent prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients with positive LLNs had worse outcomes, with 3-year DFS of 57.66% vs. 81.66%, and 5-year OS of 61.62% vs. 84.82% compared to LLN-negative patients. Conclusions: The DL model effectively predicts positive LLNs, offering an efficient alternative to traditional methods and supporting preoperative decision-making. Its clinical implementation could enhance risk stratification and personalize therapeutic strategies for rectal cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.