Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306522›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Predictors of mortality among neonates in Lusaka, Zambia: a comparative analysis of machine learning and traditional survival analysis techniques.

Tshepiso Mokoena, Moses Mukosha, Moleen Zunza, Innocent Maposa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tshepiso MokoenaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Moses MukoshaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Moleen ZunzaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Innocent MaposaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal mortality remains a critical global health issue, with 2.3 million deaths in 2022. Sub-Saharan Africa bears 57% of under five deaths despite only 30% of global births, with Zambia ranking fourth highest in terms of neonatal mortality among neighboring countries. While traditional survival analysis has identified neonatal mortality risk factors, machine learning-based prediction remains underexplored. This study aimed to identify factors associated with neonatal mortality and compare the predictive performance of traditional survival analysis and machine learning models among neonates in Lusaka, Zambia (January2018-September 2019). Methods: Demographic and clinical data from 1,018 neonates were analyzed using seven models: Weibull, Lasso, Ridge, Elastic Net (regularized Cox), Random Survival Forests, DeepSurv neural networks and Gradient Boosting Machines. Model performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation with five outer folds and three inner folds for hyperparameter tuning. Predictive accuracy was assessed using the concordance index, time dependent area under the curve at 7, 14, and 28 days, brier scores, and calibration plots. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated survival probabilities over time. Results: Of the 1,018 neonates, 757 (74.3%) died. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (TR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.63-0.81) was associated with reduced survival, while higher birthweight was protective (TR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.60-2.20). Sepsis demonstrated a paradoxical association with longer survival (TR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.30), which persisted in sensitivity analyses. Among predictive models, the Random Survival Forests achieved the highest discrimination (C-index = 0.731) and consistently low Brier scores, outperforming Weibull (C-index = 0.622) and penalized Cox models (≈ 0.620). Gradient Boosting Machines were most miscalibrated, and DeepSurv showed low discrimination (C-index = 0.553). Feature importance analysis from Random Survival Forest identified birth weight as the dominant predictor, followed by sex, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis. Discussion: While traditional Weibull models remain valuable for interpretability, machine learning approaches provide enhanced predictive accuracy. Hybrid modeling strategies may improve early risk identification and inform neonatal care in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

elastic net regressionmachine learningneonatal mortalitypredictive modelingsurvival analysisWeibull

Identifiers

PMID41306522
PMCPMC12643970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.