ArticleContinence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Patients' experiences with self-management of conservative interventions for fecal incontinence.
Article in Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: To describe patients' experience self-managing conservative interventions for fecal incontinence (FI) during usual FI care. Methods: Community-living adults with FI recruited from urogynecology and continence clinics participated in a pilot study developing a mobile application for FI self-management support. Data were collected using a demographics questionnaire, FI severity index tool, and semi-structured interviews about participants' experience self-managing conservative interventions for FI which were part of their usual care treatment plan. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim using online video software. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Data from 17 women, aged 30 to ≥60 years, 9 White, 8 Black/African American, who had FI ranging from less than one year to more than 10 years were analyzed in this study. Themes of responses described starting interventions soon after receiving them, mixed opinions about ease of performing some interventions (e.g., pelvic floor muscle exercises, completing diaries), barriers to performing interventions (e.g., forgetfulness, no time), practical strategies facilitating self-management (e.g., setting alarms, keeping a schedule), emotional strategies that were supportive and motivating (e.g., maintaining hope, seeing positive results), and advice about self-management to others with FI (seek help, give it time). Conclusion: Patient experiences provided clinicians with specific topics to target for patient education and ways to support themselves in self-managing FI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.