Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306502›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

A Dual-input deep learning architecture for classification and latency estimation in ABR signals.

Youssef Darahem, Oguz Yilmaz, Halil B Saldirim, Berna Mutlu, Hasan F Ates, Bahadir K Gunturk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Youssef DarahemDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Oguz YilmazDepartment of Audiology, Bakircay University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Halil B SaldirimDepartment of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Berna MutluDepartment of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Hasan F AtesDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Bahadir K GunturkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an objective neurophysiological evaluation designed to measure the electrical activity originating from the auditory nerve and brainstem in response to auditory stimulation. This assessment objectively records synchronous neural activity as it propagates along the auditory pathway. It is characterized by several distinct waves, most notably waves I, III, and V. Wave V plays a central clinical role since its presence and latency are routinely used to assess a patient's hearing status. However, manual identification and localization of wave V are time consuming and subjective. Previous work has explored automated detection methods to reduce this burden. Methods: In this paper, we make two primary contributions. First, we propose a multi-task deep learning pipeline that simultaneously (i) detects the presence of wave V and (ii) predicts its latency, thus eliminating the need for separate manual interpretation steps and enhancing clinical usability. Second, inspired by the audiologist's practice of comparing responses at multiple click sound intensities-specifically, using responses at high intensities, where waves are more prominent, as reference-we introduce a paired-signal approach. Each input to our deep learning model consists of the test signal together with its corresponding 80 dB reference from the same recording session. This provides the model with richer contextual information, and we show that the paired-signal approach improves over the single input approach. For multi-task learning, we design a network that consists of a backbone and two branches, one for latency prediction and the other for classification of whether wave V exists or not. We first train a latency-prediction network and then freeze its feature extraction layers to initialize a classification branch. Finally, we fine-tune the entire network using a joint loss function that balances classification and regression objectives. Results: Experimental results demonstrate that our joint model outperforms conventional single-task approaches. For classification, it achieves an F1-score of 0.92; for latency regression, it attains an Discussion: Our findings highlight the promise of convolutional neural networks for enhancing ABR analysis and underscore their potential to streamline clinical workflows in the diagnosis of auditory disorders.

Indexed as

auditory brainstem response (ABR)convolutional neural networks (CNNs)deep learningmachine learning (ML)transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41306502
PMCPMC12644055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.