ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A Dual-input deep learning architecture for classification and latency estimation in ABR signals.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an objective neurophysiological evaluation designed to measure the electrical activity originating from the auditory nerve and brainstem in response to auditory stimulation. This assessment objectively records synchronous neural activity as it propagates along the auditory pathway. It is characterized by several distinct waves, most notably waves I, III, and V. Wave V plays a central clinical role since its presence and latency are routinely used to assess a patient's hearing status. However, manual identification and localization of wave V are time consuming and subjective. Previous work has explored automated detection methods to reduce this burden. Methods: In this paper, we make two primary contributions. First, we propose a multi-task deep learning pipeline that simultaneously (i) detects the presence of wave V and (ii) predicts its latency, thus eliminating the need for separate manual interpretation steps and enhancing clinical usability. Second, inspired by the audiologist's practice of comparing responses at multiple click sound intensities-specifically, using responses at high intensities, where waves are more prominent, as reference-we introduce a paired-signal approach. Each input to our deep learning model consists of the test signal together with its corresponding 80 dB reference from the same recording session. This provides the model with richer contextual information, and we show that the paired-signal approach improves over the single input approach. For multi-task learning, we design a network that consists of a backbone and two branches, one for latency prediction and the other for classification of whether wave V exists or not. We first train a latency-prediction network and then freeze its feature extraction layers to initialize a classification branch. Finally, we fine-tune the entire network using a joint loss function that balances classification and regression objectives. Results: Experimental results demonstrate that our joint model outperforms conventional single-task approaches. For classification, it achieves an F1-score of 0.92; for latency regression, it attains an Discussion: Our findings highlight the promise of convolutional neural networks for enhancing ABR analysis and underscore their potential to streamline clinical workflows in the diagnosis of auditory disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.