ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Sham surgery as an alternative procedure for unexplained pain following transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persistent pain after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is uncommon and often unexplained after ruling out device-related or musculoskeletal causes. Psychological factors can contribute to symptom persistence, complicating treatment. In rare cases, sham surgery has been considered to address psychogenic pain. This report explores its role in managing atypical post-ICD implantation pain. Case summary: A 76-year-old female with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and a history of ICD implantation presented with persistent left parasternal pain radiating to the arm and back. Extensive evaluations ruled out device-related complications, musculoskeletal issues, and nerve injury. Psychological assessment suggested a psychogenic origin, likely reinforced by social factors. After ethics approval, sham surgery was performed, leading to complete symptom resolution and improved quality of life. This case highlights the potential role of psychological interventions in managing medically unexplained post-ICD implantation pain. Discussion: Post-ICD implantation pain ranges from routine discomfort to complications requiring intervention. Causes include device migration, musculoskeletal issues, nerve damage, infections, and psychological factors. Thorough evaluation is essential to rule out organic causes. Management includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, neuropathic pain medications, and psychological support. This case highlights the role of psychogenic factors in persistent pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.