ArticleNew RE:view (Alexandria, Va.)2025
Resumes of Job Seekers with Visual Impairments: Characteristics and Quality.
Article in New RE:view (Alexandria, Va.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: High unemployment rates and employment barriers for people with visual impairments are well documented in the literature. Minimal research has focused on job search challenges for this population, with little to none on creating effective resumes. As quality resumes are often vital for employment, this study examined the quality and characteristics of resumes of adults with visual impairments. Methods: Researchers reviewed and scored resumes submitted by 99 job seekers with visual impairments as part of a larger job search intervention study. Researchers used an adapted 9-section rubric to score resumes on standard resume sections and characteristics and scanned each resume using an online applicant tracking system (ATS) checker, for an overall assessment of resume quality. Results: Most resumes scored low in critical areas, including the header, education section, experience section, layout, style, language, and tone. Few resumes met the overall criteria for an acceptable resume. The ATS extracted about 84% of resume content and sometimes extracted incorrect information for particular elements, likely attributable to formatting issues. Discussion: The results indicate a need for improvement in resume preparation and knowledge for job seekers with visual impairments. Job seekers must present their skills and qualifications effectively with clarity, visual appeal, and ATS compatibility to increase their chances of securing an interview. Addressing this knowledge gap could help improve employment outcomes for this group. Implications for Practitioners: Our findings indicate the need for more attention to resumes in the rehabilitation process related to securing employment and have implications for creating effective resumes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.