ArticleJournal of vocational rehabilitation2019
Job quality for Americans with disabilities.
Article in Journal of vocational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meaning of Work-life Balance for Workers With Disabilities.Safety and health at work · 2024Article
- Exploring the relationship between COVID-19 risk and employment quality among a sample of individuals with disabilities.Journal of vocational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- The Employment Quality of Persons with Disabilities: Findings from a National Survey.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Article
- Education Makes the Difference: Work Preferences of Young Adults with Physical Disability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The association of disability status with job tenure for U.S. workers.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn previous research across a variety of disciplines, job quality is a concept used to assess inequality in employment. Little attention has been paid to examining job quality for workers with disabilities.
objectiveThis article seeks to expand upon existing measures of employment outcomes for people with disabilities by examining likelihood of having a good quality job compared to workers with no disability.
methodsUsing the 2014-2016 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS-ASEC), we estimate the prevalence of good quality jobs for workers with and without disabilities, by full- or part-time employment status. A job of good quality is defined as one that pays more than median wages, offers employer-sponsored health insurance and a retirement savings program.
resultsWorkers with a disability were significantly less likely to have a good quality job than those without a disability. Using logistic regression to estimate the odds of having a good job, we find that disability is not predictive of having a good job after controlling for health status.
conclusionsJob quality indicators may be useful components in tracking employment participation for workers with disabilities. Alternate measures using subjective assessments of job quality should be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.