ArticleMalawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi2025
Turkısh translatıon and valıdatıon of the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center (OSTRC) Questıonnaıres.
Article in Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06955364 (A New Measurement Tool for Investigation of Pain Monitoring and Post-Injury Effects in Athletes), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A New Measurement Tool for Investigation of Pain Monitoring and Post-Injury Effects in Athletes
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Turkish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 6th edition (SCAT6).BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exposure to repetitive activities and heavy workloads makes athletes vulnerable to overuse injuries in time. Well-timed detection of these injuries is crucial to maintaining their sports career healthily. The Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre questionnaires for Overuse Injury (OSTRC-O) and Health Problems (OSTRC-H) are universally used as valid and reliable tools in athlete health screening. We aimed to make them available to Turkish athletes and assess their psychometric properties. Methods: The questionnaires were adapted to Turkish based on systematic guidelines. Seventy-two athletes were recruited from various sports branches. The internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity of the questionnaires were checked. Their total scores were compared with the scores of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) for concurrent validity. Thirty-three participants were screened for six weeks to detect score changes and calculate effect sizes. Results: The Cronbach alpha values of the OSTRC-O and OSTRC-H were very high (.90 and .91, respectively). Test-retest reliability was excellent for both questionnaires (.98, p<.01). There was a moderate correlation between OSTRC-O and OSTRC-H scores with CMDQ and NHP (p<.01). The area under the curve (AUC) values were higher than .70 for all scales. The effect size values were moderate for all scales. Conclusions: Turkish versions of the OSTRC-O and OSTRC-H questionnaires are valid and reliable tools for Turkish-speaking athletes in different sports branches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.