ArticleCHEST critical care2025
Identification of Acute Respiratory Failure Phenotypes With Electronic Health Record Data.
Article in CHEST critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecondary analysis of clinical trial data and highly selected observational cohorts have identified 2 subphenotypes in acute respiratory failure, but have not been reported previously using only real-world electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are subphenotypes of acute ventilator-dependent respiratory failure identifiable using readily available EHR data? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study used patient encounters from the Medical University of South Carolina (n = 4,233 between 2016 and 2023) and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (n = 8,313 between 2001 and 2012) to train and validate K-means models with multiply imputed cluster analysis at 24 and 48 hours after intubation.
resultsClustering models identified 2 clusters for 24-hour and 48-hour models in both training and test cohorts with clusters separating on variables related to pulmonary physiology, perfusion, organ dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation. Cluster 2 showed higher 90-day mortality after discharge and more ventilator days compared with cluster 1 that persisted despite multivariable adjustment for age, illness severity, and comorbidities. Cluster models and clusters were stable in 0- to 24-hour and 25- to 48-hour models with crossover (29.2% and 25.9% of the test and training cohorts) from the higher-acuity cluster 2 to the lower-acuity cluster 1 subphenotype occurring by 48 hours after intubation.
interpretationOur results suggest that acute ventilator-dependent respiratory failure has 2 subphenotypes that are discernible using readily available data from EHRs with identifiable differences in pulmonary physiologic features, perfusion, organ dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation at 24 and 48 hours after intubation. This may enable future EHR tools to identify particularly vulnerable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.