ArticleMicrobial risk analysis2025
Improving a microbial risk assessment tool with direct feedback from school health staff.
Article in Microbial risk analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the impact of COVID-19, publicly available risk-based tools are becoming increasingly popular. However, subject experts develop most of these tools without consulting end users. Thus, this study aimed to explore user's perceptions, vision, and guidance for microbial risk assessment tool development through focus groups. This tool was intended to assist school health staff in decision-making regarding school respiratory viral outbreaks. Partnering with a school district in the Tucson metropolitan area, we conducted three focus groups with school health staff to gather feedback on a risk tool prototype. We discussed the staff's vision for the tool, their feedback on tool capabilities and design, and how they could leverage tool output for informing decisions, advocating with administration, or educating parents, students, or staff. Focus groups were conducted at the district health office, and the transcripts were analyzed by two researchers using inductively informed themes. Thematic analysis revealed that a comprehensive microbial risk assessment tool must have the potential to manage large amounts of data, scope for incorporation of existing data management systems, have real-time data processing, and produce context-specific recommendations for advocacy. Risk tools can expand personalized risk assessment and management strategies. Directly engaging users will advance microbial risk assessment impact and implementation. In the context of schools, a collaborative, comprehensive, digital and real time microbial risk assessment tool is a timely demand by the school health staff to manage microbial risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.