Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306278›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Antibacterial activity of

Rewaida Abdel-Gaber, Mohammed Albeshr, Mohamed A Dkhil, Nada Almohawis, Kareem A Abdelmeguid, Denis Delic, Saleh Al Quraishy, Esam M Al-Shaebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rewaida Abdel-GaberDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlbeshrDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed A DkhilDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nada AlmohawisDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Kareem A AbdelmeguidBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
Denis DelicTranslational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Saleh Al QuraishyDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Esam M Al-ShaebiDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The rise of antibiotic-resistant microbes has diminished antibiotic effectiveness, leading to the exploration of alternatives. Krameria lappacea has been used traditionally for various ailments. This study evaluates the in vitro antibacterial and cytotoxic potential of its roots and identifies its active constituents. Methods: Roots of K. lappacea were acquired from a Riyadh market. They were extracted using methanol and the maceration method, followed by phytochemical screening via Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry. Antibacterial properties were assessed using agar well diffusion and broth microdilution methods, while cytotoxicity was tested on human lung A549 and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines via MTT assay. Results: Phytochemical analysis of the extract identified alkaloids, phenolics (including anthraquinones and chlorogenic acids), and flavonoids (such as dihydrokaempferol, epicatechin, and fisetin). The most susceptible bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes, both Gram-positive, while Gram-negative Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica were resistant. Extract effectively suppressed bacterial growth, particularly against L. monocytogenes and S. aureus, showing moderate activity against E. coli and S. enterica, with MBC values higher than MICs. Cytotoxicity testing yielded IC50 values of 142.27 ± 1.02 μg/ml and 64.81 ± 0.26 μg/ml, respectively, compared to doxorubicin. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that K. lappacea possesses notable antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria and demonstrates cytotoxic effects against human cancer cell lines, indicating its potential as a natural source of bioactive compounds for antimicrobial and anticancer applications.

Indexed as

antibacterial activitycytotoxicitygram-bacteriaKrameria lappaceaphytochemical screening

Identifiers

PMID41306278
PMCPMC12645635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.