Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306177›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Renal Artery Stenting for Traumatic Dissection.

Glenn Yang Han Ng, Joel Jingkai Liu, Haiyuan Shi, Kentson Jing Xin Lee

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Glenn Yang Han NgRadiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Joel Jingkai LiuRadiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Haiyuan ShiRadiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Kentson Jing Xin LeeRadiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal injuries are frequently seen in the context of trauma, with currently well-established guidelines for classification and management, such as those prescribed by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. However, traumatic dissection of the renal arteries specifically is uncommon; clarity regarding optimal management is currently lacking, despite the possible long-term sequelae, including loss of nephron function and renovascular hypertension. While medical management alone had sometimes been suggested, endovascular stenting is potentially a viable minimally invasive intervention that may further reduce the risk of long-term complications. In this report, we present a case of traumatic renal artery dissection first seen on computed tomography in a patient who presented following a high-speed road traffic accident. Percutaneous endovascular stenting of a dissected renal artery was performed, with subsequent restoration of renal perfusion on follow-up imaging, as well as maintenance of normal serum creatinine and blood pressure at longer-term follow-up. We also review the existing literature, which, despite the scarcity, affirms our experience of favourable outcomes post-intervention.

Indexed as

acute renal injuryarterial dissectionrenal artery stentingrenal involvementrenovascular hypertension

Identifiers

PMID41306177
PMCPMC12643951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.