Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306142›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Perioperative Antibiotic Administration Review: An Analysis of Outpatient Surgeries at OhioHealth Doctors Hospital.

Rayyan Bhutta, Thomas Shneker, Samantha Currier, Alexander Caskey, Vincent Relli-Dempsey, Matthias Franzen, Samir Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rayyan BhuttaMedical School, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, USA.
Thomas ShnekerMedical School, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, USA.
Samantha CurrierAnesthesiology, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Alexander CaskeyAnesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Vincent Relli-DempseyAnesthesiology, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Matthias FranzenAnesthesiology, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Samir PatelAnesthesiology, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA vital part of preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) is perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Antibiotics must be administered within a certain window of time, usually 15 to 60 minutes prior to the surgical incision, for them to be effective. The most frequently utilized medication, cefazolin, can be administered quickly by intravenous push (IVP), but other medications, such as vancomycin and clindamycin, need longer infusion times. Antibiotic efficacy declines, and the risk of SSIs is increased when scheduling requirements are not followed. With special focus on time, dosage, and variation by surgery type, this study evaluates adherence to perioperative antibiotic administration guidelines in outpatient surgeries at OhioHealth Doctors Hospital.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at OhioHealth Doctors Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. Patients aged 18 and older who underwent outpatient surgery between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, were included. A total of 448 cases were analyzed. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and reviewed to assess antibiotic type, administration timing, dosing accuracy (based on patient weight), and surgery type. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests, including chi-square and confidence intervals, were used for analysis.

resultsAntibiotics were given to just 3.3% of patients over the advised pre-incision period. Antibiotics offered via IVP had a greater probability of being delivered on schedule (4.6%) compared to those that needed infusion pumps (0.7%, p = 0.0446). The most frequently administered antibiotic was cefazolin (65.6%), with 88.8% of doses being appropriately weight-adjusted. Nonetheless, there were notable differences in timing protocol adherence by surgical specialty, with numerous specialties displaying 0% compliance and orthopedic procedures exhibiting the highest adherence at 7.9%.

conclusionAdherence to perioperative timing standards was concerningly inadequate, even though antibiotic selection and dosage were generally suitable. The findings point to a substantial workflow and protocol enforcement gap at the system level. Operational adjustments like real-time warnings, checklists integrated with electronic health records (EHRs), and simpler delivery techniques may increase adherence and reduce preventable SSIs. Future research is required to assess how these strategies influence patient outcomes.

Indexed as

anesthesiology practiceantibiotic administrationcefazolinclinical practice guidelinesurgical site infections (ssi)weight-based dosing

Identifiers

PMID41306142
PMCPMC12646811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.