ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2025
The fitness costs and benefits of hunter-gatherer locomotor engagement.
Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why Do Humans Exercise? A Neuro-Evolutionary Framework for Discretionary Physical Effort.Evolutionary anthropology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bipedalism is a distinguishing feature of our species and, as such, there has been much interest in the energetic costs and foraging returns of walking and running, especially among hunter-gatherer societies. However, humans routinely exhibit extensive locomotor versatility, with hunter-gatherers consistently also swimming, diving, and climbing. Additionally, the fitness costs and benefits of locomotion extend well beyond energy income and expenditure. Here, we review evidence from over 900 ethnographic documents across a worldwide sample of more than 50 hunter-gatherer societies to examine the fitness costs and benefits of walking, running, climbing, swimming, and diving. We show that the fitness costs and benefits of locomotor engagement consistently extend well beyond energetics to include, for example, currencies of status, protection from hazards, and risks of injury or death. These fitness factors differ in significance between locomotor modalities, with implications for the comparison of bipedal and non-bipedal locomotion. For example, while energetic demands represent the major cost of most bipedal engagements, the fitness implications of potential fall injuries may outweigh those of energetics in tree climbing. These results inform existing debates relating to hominin locomotor evolution and hunter-gatherer behavioural ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.