Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305948›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Cachexia and Wasting in Chronic Illness: Regulatory and Clinical Trial Update.

Francesco Fioretti, Stephan von Haehling, Andrew J S Coats, Javed Butler, Egidio Del Fabbro, Richard J E Skipworth, Barry J A Laird, Stefan D Anker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco FiorettiBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Stephan von HaehlingDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Andrew J S CoatsUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Javed ButlerBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Egidio Del FabbroMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Richard J E SkipworthClinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Barry J A LairdSt Columba's Hospice Care, Edinburgh, UK.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK) of German Heart Center Charité, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cachexia, a syndrome marked by nonintentional weight loss, muscle wasting, functional decline and poor prognosis, affects 50%-80% of cancer patients, severely impacting quality of life, treatment tolerance and survival. A 'Regulatory and Trial Update Workshop' was organized by the Society on Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD) in December 2024 in Washington, DC, focused on clinical trial endpoints, standards of care and recent advancements. This article provides a summary of the discussions that were held during the first day of the workshop. Despite ongoing research, effective therapies for cachexia remain limited. Existing treatments, such as nutritional supplements, progestins, anti-inflammatories and anabolic agents, have shown mixed results, often improving appetite or lean mass without consistent functional benefits. Common muscle mass measurements, like CT scans of the L3 vertebra, are inadequate as primary endpoints because of biological variability and small effect sizes and because they do not necessarily translate into clinical benefit. Trials continue to face challenges in meeting regulatory requirements, which mandate improvements in both body composition and functional outcomes. Regulatory consensus emphasizes demonstrating clinically meaningful benefits in patient-reported outcomes/physical function and/or morbidity-mortality using validated instruments, adequate safety exposure, recognition that handgrip and weight alone are insufficient, feasibility in advanced disease, consideration of general activity measures, optional but informative body composition data and, for a pan-cancer label, benefits across at least three distinct cancers. Patient-centred endpoints, emphasizing real-life functioning and social participation, are essential as patients prioritize daily activity and independence over isolated physical measures. Clinical trials presented during the meeting included the MENAC trial, which tested a multimodal intervention combining nutrition, exercise, anti-inflammatory drugs and cancer therapy, achieved modest weight stabilization but no significant improvements in muscle mass or activity. In contrast, TCMCB07, an MC-4 receptor antagonist, demonstrated promising results in preclinical and early-phase human studies, showing weight stabilization and improved caloric intake with good tolerability. ART27.13, a dual CB1/CB2 receptor agonist, also demonstrated positive effects in appetite stimulation and weight stabilization. For S-pindolol, which targets appetite and metabolism, Phase IIb/III trials are to be initiated, following an earlier Phase II trial that showed improved muscle mass and muscle strength (hand grip strength). Future treatments must focus on integrating patient-centred goals, therapeutic mechanisms and meaningful clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

CachexiaWasting SyndromeChronic DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeoplasmsQuality of Lifecachexiaclinical trialendpointsregulatory issuestreatment

Identifiers

PMID41305948
PMCPMC12658287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.