ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Cachexia and Wasting in Chronic Illness: Regulatory and Clinical Trial Update.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- C26 and CT26 colorectal cancer models exhibit divergent cachexia phenotypes, intramuscular inflammation, and protein turnover signaling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Role of New Agents and Supportive Care in a Multimodal Approach to Cancer Cachexia.Cancers · 2026Review
- The Muscle Function Deficit Concept and Inflammaging.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Preoperative nutrition in colorectal cancer surgery: mini review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Cachexia and Wasting in Chronic Illness: Regulatory and Clinical Trial Update.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cachexia, a syndrome marked by nonintentional weight loss, muscle wasting, functional decline and poor prognosis, affects 50%-80% of cancer patients, severely impacting quality of life, treatment tolerance and survival. A 'Regulatory and Trial Update Workshop' was organized by the Society on Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD) in December 2024 in Washington, DC, focused on clinical trial endpoints, standards of care and recent advancements. This article provides a summary of the discussions that were held during the first day of the workshop. Despite ongoing research, effective therapies for cachexia remain limited. Existing treatments, such as nutritional supplements, progestins, anti-inflammatories and anabolic agents, have shown mixed results, often improving appetite or lean mass without consistent functional benefits. Common muscle mass measurements, like CT scans of the L3 vertebra, are inadequate as primary endpoints because of biological variability and small effect sizes and because they do not necessarily translate into clinical benefit. Trials continue to face challenges in meeting regulatory requirements, which mandate improvements in both body composition and functional outcomes. Regulatory consensus emphasizes demonstrating clinically meaningful benefits in patient-reported outcomes/physical function and/or morbidity-mortality using validated instruments, adequate safety exposure, recognition that handgrip and weight alone are insufficient, feasibility in advanced disease, consideration of general activity measures, optional but informative body composition data and, for a pan-cancer label, benefits across at least three distinct cancers. Patient-centred endpoints, emphasizing real-life functioning and social participation, are essential as patients prioritize daily activity and independence over isolated physical measures. Clinical trials presented during the meeting included the MENAC trial, which tested a multimodal intervention combining nutrition, exercise, anti-inflammatory drugs and cancer therapy, achieved modest weight stabilization but no significant improvements in muscle mass or activity. In contrast, TCMCB07, an MC-4 receptor antagonist, demonstrated promising results in preclinical and early-phase human studies, showing weight stabilization and improved caloric intake with good tolerability. ART27.13, a dual CB1/CB2 receptor agonist, also demonstrated positive effects in appetite stimulation and weight stabilization. For S-pindolol, which targets appetite and metabolism, Phase IIb/III trials are to be initiated, following an earlier Phase II trial that showed improved muscle mass and muscle strength (hand grip strength). Future treatments must focus on integrating patient-centred goals, therapeutic mechanisms and meaningful clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.