ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Transoral Robotic Lingual Tonsillectomy for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOur objective was to investigate the safety and efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) lingual tonsillectomy (LT) with and without epiglottopexy and to compare it with non-robotic approaches for children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
methodsA multi-institutional retrospective chart review was conducted on 56 patients who underwent TORS LT (32 males, 24 females; mean age 11.7 ± 4.2 years; 29 syndromic) between 2015 and 2024 at 2 tertiary care pediatric hospitals. Preoperative and postoperative polysomnogram data were collected and analyzed, along with clinical and demographic data to analyze predictors of surgical success.
resultsOf the patients with pre- and postoperative polysomnogram, 26 patients (60.5%) were considered a surgical success. Significant improvements were seen in apnea hypopnea index (mean reduction of -14.39 ± 5.2; p = 0.0079), apnea hypopnea index during rapid eye movement (mean reduction of -25.89 ± 8.8; p = 0.0057), and O2 nadir (mean improvement of 5.73% ± 1.64%; p = 0.0012). There were no significant differences in the proportion of surgical success based on preoperative OSA severity, presence of a syndrome, or presence of obesity. Eleven patients experienced complications (19.6%), including postoperative hemorrhage requiring operative intervention (8.9%) and oropharyngeal scarring (3.6%).
conclusionFor pediatric patients with OSA and lingual tonsillar hypertrophy, TORS is an effective and safe method of performing LT, with benefits including excellent 3-dimensional visualization and a greater ability to distinguish the lingual tonsil/tongue musculature interface. While this is the largest pediatric TORS LT study to date, further research with larger sample sizes and additional sleep and quality of life metrics would add to the existing literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.