Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305826›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

A study revealed the impact of gut microbiota on acne vulgaris: Evidence based on Mendelian randomization.

Yi Tang, Yuehan Ren, Junning Zhang, Jiale Wang, Yunqiao Zhou, Weiping Kong, Qingyong He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gut and skin dysbiosis in acne vulgaris: a comparative microbiome analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi TangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yuehan RenBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Junning ZhangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiale WangFuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yunqiao ZhouBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Weiping KongDepartment of TCM Rheumatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingyong HeDepartment of Cardiology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7905-6096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cumulative evidence has demonstrated an association between gut microbiota and acne vulgaris. However, previous studies have yielded mixed results, and despite extensive investigations, the causal relationship between them remains unclear. The genome-wide association studies summary data of 196 gut microbiota and acne vulgaris was obtained from the most extensive available genome-wide association studies database. A 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study, which utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables in 2 independent datasets to assess causal relationships between an exposure and an outcome, was used to test the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and acne vulgaris. The MR analysis was primarily performed with the inverse variance weighted method, and MR-Egger, Cochran Q test and Mendelian randomization pleiotropic residuals and outliers were performed as sensitivity analyses. The inverse variance weighted analysis revealed that the risk of acne formation was correlated with a total of 14 gut microbiota taxa that predicted the composition of intestinal flora. Among them, class Coriobacteriia (odds ratio [OR] = 0.588, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.357-0.966, P = .036), class Erysipelotrichia (OR = 0.559, 95% CI: 0.357-0.966, P = .036), family Coriobacteriaceae (OR = 0.599, 95% CI: 0.357-0.966, P = .036), family Erysipelotrichaceae (OR = 0.559, 95% CI: 0.325-0.963, P = .036), genus Candidatus Soleaferrea (OR = 0.576, 95% CI: 0.355-0.934, P = .025), genus Fusicatenibacter (OR = 0.533, 95% CI: 0.306-0.927, P = .026), genus Lactobacillus (OR = 0.658, 95% CI: 0.450-0.963, P = .031), order Erysipelotrichales (OR = 0.559, 95% CI: 0.325-0.963, P = .036) abundance was negatively correlated with acne vulgaris incidence. Family Bacteroidaceae (OR = 2.579, 95% CI: 1.237-5.378, P = .011), family Family XIII (OR = 1.456, 95% CI: 1.173-4.288, P = .015), genus Allisonella (OR = 1.385, 95% CI: 1.003-4.288, P = .015), genus Bacteroides (OR = 2.444, 95% CI: 1.053-5.671, P = .037), genus Coprococcus3 (OR = 2.122, 95% CI: 1.095-4.111, P = .026), genus Romboutsia (OR = 1.677, 95% CI: 1.064-2.645, P = .026) abundance had a positive correlation with acne vulgaris development. The reliability and robustness of the findings were confirmed using a variety of sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger regression, Cochran Q test, and Mendelian randomization pleiotropic residuals and outliers, which revealed no indication of horizontal pleiotropy or significant heterogeneity among single nucleotide polymorphisms. The MR study has validated the potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and acne vulgaris, providing some insights into potential therapeutic targets and interventions for this dermatological concern. Nevertheless, further investigation is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization Analysisacne vulgariscausal relationshipgut microbiotaMendelian randomizationskin

Identifiers

PMID41305826
PMCPMC12643615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.