Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41305813›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Prediction of 180-day post-admission's GOS in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on explainable machine learning technology.

Cuijie Yuan, Mengyao Wang, Yafang Jiang, Hongwu Li, Chengpeng Zhan, Lijuan Xu, Xiafei Zhou, Guofeng Yu, Xinjiang Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cuijie YuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.
Mengyao WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.
Yafang JiangDepartment of Nursing, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.
Hongwu LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.
Chengpeng ZhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.
Lijuan XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Jiangshan People's Hospital, Jiangshan, China.
Xiafei ZhouDepartment of Nursing, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.
Guofeng YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.
Xinjiang YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital), Quzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-4074-2631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective outcome prediction is crucial in the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). This study developed machine learning models to predict the 180-day Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score using clinical parameters and identify key prognostic factors. All patients with SICH were randomized into training and internal validation cohortsin a 7:3 ratio. After the most relevant variables were selected by the SVM-RFE and LASSO algorithms, the predictive efficiency of the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), XGBoost, random forest (RF), and lightgbm models was evaluated through an exhaustive suite of performance indicators. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) methods were engaged to explain the top-performingmodel. The model was developed for 215 patients. The GBDT model showed stable performance in predictive power in both the internal and external validation cohorts, with the following metrics assessed in the internal test set: AUROC (0.865 ± 0.069); AUPRC (0.834 ± 0.090); accuracy (0.822 ± 0.065), F1 (0.716 ± 0.114); precision (0.787 ± 0.147); recall (0.676 ± 0.138); sensitivity (0.902 ± 0.070) specificity, (0.787 ± 0.147). The GBDT model was assessed in the outer test set with the following metrics: AUROC: 0.785 (0.752, 0.832), AUPRC: 0.693 (0.649, 0.762), accuracy: 0.770 (0.739, 0.807), F1: 0.769 (0.738, 0.806), precision: 0.769 (0.738, 0.806), recall: 0.770 (0.739, 0.807), sensitivity: 0.826 (0.793, 0.863), Specificity: 0.710 (0.662, 0.761). We found that the blood platelet count, serum calcium level, and hemorrhage in the left occipital lobe, right temporal lobe, and right parietal lobe were the 5 most important features for GOS prediction in the GBDT and RF models. The outcomes of SHAP and LIME were consistent with those of previous studies. The GBDT model exhibited the best prediction performance. Moreover, it has the potential to aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and guiding clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageGlasgow Outcome ScaleMachine LearningAgedDecision TreesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisGBDTGOSLIMESHAPSICHXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41305813
PMCPMC12643675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.