ArticleMedicine2025
Prediction of the disease burden of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China: A comparative analysis of ARIMA, LSTM, and DNN models.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- China-East Asia comparison of male infertility burden and trend prediction: evidence from GBD 2023.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), highly prevalent in southern China, often presents insidious early symptoms, resulting in advanced-stage diagnosis, significant treatment challenges, and poor prognosis. Accurate prediction of NPC's disease burden is essential for devising effective prevention and treatment strategies and optimizing medical resource allocation. This study used the 2021 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study's disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) data on NPC in China. It developed 3 disease burden prediction models (ARIMA, deep neural networks [DNN], and long short-term memory [LSTM]), whose performance was assessed by mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, and RMSE. The DNN model demonstrated superior fitting on the training set with the lowest error metrics, yet it exhibited overfitting as its performance declined on the testing set. In contrast, the ARIMA model, with its assumption of stationarity, achieved the best generalization with the lowest mean absolute error and mean absolute percentage error on the testing data. The LSTM model recorded higher errors on the test set. Forecasts for 2022 to 2030 showed that while ARIMA predicted stable DALYs, both DNN and LSTM models indicated a gradual decline. The future predictions of all 3 models indicate that although the disease burden of NPC may gradually decrease, it remains extremely severe. This study compared ARIMA, DNN, and LSTM models for predicting NPC disease burden in China. Although DNN excelled on training data, ARIMA generalized best on testing, while LSTM struggled due to limited data. Future research should integrate diverse sources and improve interpretability to support NPC prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.