Observational studyMedicine2025
The role of Hoffa fat pad in total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP), or Hoffa fat pad, is frequently resected during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve surgical exposure. However, its removal may affect patellar tendon integrity, vascular supply, and long-term functional outcomes. The role of the IPFP in osteoarthritis and its contribution to anterior knee pain remain topics of debate. To compare radiological and functional outcomes of patients undergoing TKA with either preservation or complete resection of the IPFP. This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single institution between 2018 and 2021. Patients undergoing primary TKA for idiopathic osteoarthritis were divided into 2 groups according to the operating surgeon's routine practice: IPFP preserved or IPFP resected. The primary outcomes were Insall-Salvati ratio, Oxford Knee Score, and Visual Analog Scale for anterior knee pain. Radiological and clinical evaluations were performed at 6 and 12 weeks, and annually up to 3 years postoperatively. At final follow-up, baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Postoperative Insall-Salvati ratio was 1.077 ± 0.12 in the excision group and 1.076 ± 0.12 in the preservation group (P = .93). Knee flexion improved similarly (115.8 ± 10.2° vs 116.0 ± 10.5°, P = .86). At 3 years, mean Oxford Knee Score was 20.3 ± 5.1 in the excision group and 19.9 ± 5.4 in the preservation group (P = .45), while mean Visual Analog Scale for anterior knee pain was 3.27 ± 0.4 versus 3.17 ± 0.4 (P = .064). Surgical time was shorter in the excision group (88 ± 8 vs 90 ± 6 minutes, P = .022); however, this small difference is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in functional outcomes from baseline, with no long-term superiority of either approach. IPFP management during TKA does not significantly influence mid-term radiological or functional outcomes. Preservation may help maintain tendon integrity, whereas excision may modestly reduce operative time without affecting long-term patient-reported results. The choice to resect or preserve should therefore be based on intraoperative exposure and surgeon preference rather than expectations of improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.