ArticleMedicine2025
Identification of radiotherapy-sensitive genes for predicting prognosis, immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity in uterine carcinosarcoma patients.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUterine carcinosarcoma is a rare gynecological malignancy characterized by high invasiveness and poor prognosis. At present, common treatment methods include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Radiotherapy can induce tumor cells to produce reactive oxygen species through ionizing radiation, leading to damage to intracellular DNA and mediating tumor cell death. Based on this, we identified a novel radiotherapy sensitive gene for predicting the prognosis, immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity of uterine carcinosarcoma patients.
methodsThe Cancer Genome Atlas database was used to obtain genetic and clinical information of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma. A risk scoring model was built using Lasso regression model. In order to enhance the predictive ability of the model, a column chart for prediction was created and calibration curves were used. Gene set enrichment analysis was used to evaluate pathway enrichment in patients with different risk cohorts. Finally, we investigated drug sensitivity between high-risk and low-risk cohorts.
resultsWe found that the survival rate of patients who received radiotherapy was significantly higher than that of patients who did not receive radiotherapy. In the constructed risk scoring model, high-risk patients have a worse prognosis. Pathway enrichment indicates that high-risk patients are enriched in regulating tumor cell growth, metabolism, and angiogenesis pathways, which may be a reason for poor prognosis in high-risk patients. High risk and low-risk patients have different sensitivities to different drugs. The 1, 3, and 5-year survival values predicted by the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.82, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively, indicating the reliability of our prediction model. Finally, multiple regression analysis showed that the radiation therapy sensitive genes SSBP2, ELAVL3, and CST1 in the model can independently affect the prognosis of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma. Patients with high expression of SSBP2 have a better prognosis than those with low expression, while patients with high expression of ELAVL3 and CST1 have a poorer prognosis.
conclusionWe have developed a scoring method for uterine carcinosarcoma based on the effectiveness of radiotherapy. This method can evaluate the prognosis of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma and has certain guiding significance for the clinical treatment of subsequent uterine carcinosarcoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.