ReviewMedicine2025
Case report and literature review of pleural myeloid sarcoma.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleMyeloid sarcoma (MS) is an extramedullary solid tumor composed of myeloid progenitor cells, which is rare in non-leukemic patients. Our research aims to enhance the understanding of the challenges in diagnostic and therapeutic of MS. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 61-year-old male was admitted to hospital presenting with "malignant pleural tumor diagnosed 2 months prior, accompanied by chest distress for over a month." DIAGNOSIS: Cytological analysis of pleural effusion confirmed malignant cells and supported by immunohistochemical results. Bone marrow biopsy showed 83.5% blasts, with flow cytometry indicating 56.32% tumor cells and the presence of the AML1-ETO fusion gene (FLT3-ITD+). Cytogenetic analysis revealed complex karyotypic abnormalities. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: After treated with the Idarubicin-Cytarabine regimen and intrapleural cisplatin, bone marrow biopsy revealed residual tumor cells (0.46%). Further consolidation with the Idarubicin-Cytarabine regimen and additional cycles of azacitidine plus venetoclax and cytarabine plus venetoclax were administered. Unfortunately, the patient passed away following disease progression. LESSONS: Although pleural myeloid sarcoma is extremely rare, it must be included in the differential diagnosis for unexplained solid pleural masses, particularly when accompanied by pleural effusion. Upon diagnosis, comprehensive staging investigations, including bone marrow biopsy and flow cytometry, must be performed immediately. The successful management of such complex cases relies on the close collaboration of a multidisciplinary team, including radiologists, pathologists, hematologists, and thoracic surgeons. Radiologists identify atypical imaging features, pathologists confirm the diagnosis through precise immunophenotyping, and ultimately, hematologists formulate and execute the correct treatment plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.