Observational studyMedicine2025
Identification of biomarkers of Shenhailong formula in benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment: An observation study using network pharmacology and Mendelian randomization analysis.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shenhailong formula, a classic herbal prescription, shows potential in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but its candidate components and mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to preliminarily clarify its therapeutic mechanisms in BPH using network pharmacology, Mendelian randomization (MR), and molecular docking. In this study, BPH-related datasets were first obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus database, and different expression analysis was performed to identify differentially expression genes. Meanwhile, Chinese herbs related target genes and BPH-related target genes were retrieved from public database, and candidate genes were screened by taking the intersection of the 3 above. Subsequently, MR analysis was conducted to explore the causal relationship between candidate genes and BPH, and then biomarkers were generated through expression level validation. Finally, enrichment analysis, molecular regulatory network construction, and molecular docking were performed. By integrating 779 BPH-related target genes, 2879 Chinese herb-related target genes, and 3106 differentially expression genes, 41 candidate genes were obtained. MR analysis revealed that 12 genes had potential causal relationships with BPH. Eventually, 3 biomarkers were identified: serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1, epidermal growth factor, and ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 1. All 3 biomarkers were significantly enriched in the "kras signaling dn," "pancreas beta cells," "estrogen response early," "estrogen response late," and "spermatogenesis" pathways (gene set enrichment analysis, false discovery rate < 0.05). " Furthermore, transcription factors GATA2 and JUN exerted their influence on 3 biomarkers, and the actions of hsa-miR-4459 and hsa-miR-4433a-3p were involved in the regulation of epidermal growth factor and ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 1. Additionally, molecular docking showed that Stepholidine and Adenosine triphosphate had higher affinity within biomarkers, which were the potential candidate components for treating BPH with Shenhailong formula, supported by their strong binding affinity with the protein of biomarkers. This study revealed the potential targets and potential candidate components of Shenhailong formula in the treatment of BPH, and confirmed that they had strong affinity. It provided a theoretical basis for the treatment of BPH with Shenhailong formula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.