ArticleMedicine2025
Gene-metabolite interactions in aortic dissection: Insights from metabolic and single-cell analyses.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging macro bibliometrics and micro molecular mechanisms: an integrated analysis of global aortic dissection research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic dissection (AD) involves complex interactions among amino acid, glucose, and lipid metabolism, exacerbating aortic inflammation and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, coupled with smooth muscle cell (SMC) dysfunction (phenotypic alteration, aging, apoptosis). To explore AD pathogenesis, we integrated single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), metabolomics, machine learning, and Mendelian randomization to investigate SMC changes and gene-metabolite interactions. ScRNA-seq data (GSE213740, GSE155468) were analyzed for cell clustering and pseudo-time trajectories via Seurat and Monocle2. Metabolomics (9 samples: 6 AD, 3 controls) and machine learning validated key genes/metabolites, with Mendelian randomization assessing causal links. Nine cell subsets and 2000 variable genes were identified, with SMCs central to AD via cholesterol metabolism. APOE and PLTP were key genes; metabolomics highlighted cholesterol esters (CEs) and triglycerides (TGs) as critical metabolites. Machine learning confirmed APOE/PLTP's high predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.796-0.989). Mendelian randomization linked elevated CEs and TGs to increased AD risk (IVW: P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). This study establishes a gene-metabolite network where APOE and PLTP regulate CEs/TGs, influencing SMC function and AD progression, offering potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.